I didn't see a lot of swerve on the van Bronckhorst shot. The swerve on the Forlan goal didn't look that unusual either, Stekelenburg just misplayed it.
The keepers in general seemed to be getting caught by the last bit of swerve at the end: they are doing their footwork/movement to get positioned where they think the ball is going but then it goes the other way, etc. On the Muntari goal from distance the Uruguay keeper was shuffling his feet towards the one side then got caught out. On this van Bronckhorst crack he stayed static but got caught out by the pace and inevitably the placement.
I didn't see a lot of swerve on the van Bronckhorst shot. The swerve on the Forlan goal didn't look that unusual either, Stekelenburg just misplayed it.
There wasn't: I think the keeper stayed static in anticipation of swerve that didn't occur. When a shooter follows through across his body as such you tend to think there's going to be some action on the ball, but in this case it was pretty much a straight arrow rocket, perfectly placed.
What is it about Dutch shooting and Southern Hemisphere World Cups?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKM0F...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlvq2KQ4Y48
I wonder what Arie Haan thought of van Bronckhorst's strike?
You'll nevr stop the beechball
You'll never stop the beechball! ... (ad nauseaum)
or and,,,
He'll never book van Bronkhorst
He'll never book van Bronkhorst! ... (ad nauseaum-again)
^You mean van Bommel, right?
I too cannot abide John Helm (northern git), so I watched the final today on ABC with Martin Tyler doing play-by-play and Efan Ekoku doing analysis/colour.
Much, much better.
Bookmarks