Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Hargraeves, Fernandes, JDG2 - A difference or . ?

  1. #1

    Default Hargraeves, Fernandes, JDG2 - A difference or . ?

    Would Canada be still in the hunt or comfortably through to the Hex if these three players had suited up for the current WCQ? How about Nsaliwa added to the mix? What would our starting lineup have looked like?

    If you think that we would be coasting, comparatively speaking, then the CSA must immediately begin aggressively asking FIFA to changes its rules about citizens of one country playing for another based upon the nationality of their mother or father as was the case with Hargraeves and Fernandes. The CSA must demand that only players who are born in a country, or have legally and legitimately acquired citizenship in another country completely independently of their ancestry, may play for a national team. In addition, we obviously need to do much, much more (and there have been all kinds of suggestions posted on this board) to provide players such as JDG2 a reason to play for Canada as their first choice. It is an expensive thing in terms of lost talent for lesser soccer nations. Even the USA is losing very good players as can be seen with Rossi and, very likely, Subotic.

    If you feel that the inclusion of these players would make little difference to our present WCQ chances, then clearly, Canada is NOT producing players who ever possess truly World class talent, with a rare few exceptions over a long period of time. In this case, we are really and truly lost until such time as the provinces act in the interests of indiviual players, provide for improved and mandatory coaching certification, and make it as part of every provincial vision that getting to the World Cup is THE number one national priority for soccer in this country. Until such time, ???

    Like most, if not all of you, I am gutted by the poor showing, again, of the MNT during WCQ. In fact, if any tangible, legislated, positive changes do not happen immediately to improve the situation, my 23 years of being a Canada supporter will soon end - it is literally too stressful to hope and dream for a losing program (my sincere apologies to the players who give it their all time and again!).

    So, my question to you, aside from those posed above, is this. What MUST the CSA do to finally make things better, and how does a guy like me become involved in the process? After all, it is one thing for me to chirp, but quite another to actually DO something since the arrogant, ignorant, foolish, and weak CSA directors do not listen to mere words or common sense.

    Cheers!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    It's not just up to the CSA. All of the "poachee" countries should be putting up a united front against FIFA.

    Something else, there seems to be no shame in any of this. Why does FIFA condone such unsportsmanlike behaviour, diving, cheating, violence, poaching.

    There seems to be no embarrassment at all.

    If the Canadian hockey team poached a player from Korea who wasn't a citizen (but whose grandparent was born here) I would be ashamed. Wouldn't that be an indictment of the Canadian hockey program that it couldn't produce quality players?

    Look at England, foreign coach, "foreign" player(s) what's the point of international competition if you can "buy" a team. Aren't they embarrassed that they have to poach players, and from a minnow such as Canada to boot.

    I recall the Canadian hockey team picking up Peter Stastny and Petr Nedved but both had defected and had to become citizens to be eligible. I see no issue with this (aside from the issue of lack of talent development), or in the case of Whore II because he had most of his development in Holland and he became a citizen. I just didn't like his stringing us along.

  3. #3
    Member theaub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Thornhill, Ontario
    Posts
    1,169

    Default

    So you're saying that if Wayne Gretzky had a Canadian grandparent and was completely US otherwise, and he said he wanted to play for Canada you would've said no? Seriously?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    2,744

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by theaub

    So you're saying that if Wayne Gretzky had a Canadian grandparent and was completely US otherwise, and he said he wanted to play for Canada you would've said no? Seriously?
    Seriously. Why can't you understand that.

    Has Canada become such a stand-for-nothing, citizenship by convenience, worthless piece of PC goo, that this country means nothing to some of you out there.

    There are some here who are so selfish and cynical against their home I wonder why they are here (this site).

    I honestly don't understand a few of you guys. This whole discussion is the raison d'etre of why the Voyageurs were started...to support Canada. If you want to support your heritage country more than Canada why are you at this site? Makes no sense.

    Have you any patriotism at all? Why have international sporting events at all then?

  5. #5
    Like a BAWSE finchster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Island, BC, Canada.
    Posts
    990

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by theaub

    So you're saying that if Wayne Gretzky had a Canadian grandparent and was completely US otherwise, and he said he wanted to play for Canada you would've said no? Seriously?
    If I remember correctly Gretzky has Belarusian grandparents. He could have played for the CCCP . Anyway Hockey has better international eligibility rules. I am pretty sure the IIHF states you have to have citizenship of the country you wish to represent. So Grandchildren or children of immigrants can't represent their parents nations.

    Thomas Vanek of the Buffalo Sabers, his dad was a Czech hockey player who moved to Austria and Thomas was born there. He moved to the USA at 16 to improve as a hockey player and I am sure he has American Citizenship now. So under Fifa rules, he could have played for Czech Republic, Austria, and USA but at the time of his decision in hockey he only had one choice Austria. Because of this Austria has a hockey star to build the sport around, something Canada lacks in soccer.

    Fifa should adopt more strict rules like in hockey. There will always be opportunistic people like anywhere, but I believe with more strict rules we would see less of this. Its really embarrassing to see many international sides stealing players or fast tracking 15-20 Brazilians for citizenship to play for their team.

  6. #6

    Default

    Hockey rules aren't the tightest actually. Brian Trottier played for Canada and the US in consecutive Canada Cups. Also, I believe that Evgeni Nabokov has represented Kazhakstan and Russia at the World Championship level.

    Also, Tam Nsaliwa seems to have taken on a mythical ability amongst some V's. Having not seen much of him, is he really that incredible?

  7. #7
    Like a BAWSE finchster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Island, BC, Canada.
    Posts
    990

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by RJB

    Hockey rules aren't the tightest actually. Brian Trottier played for Canada and the US in consecutive Canada Cups. Also, I believe that Evgeni Nabokov has represented Kazhakstan and Russia at the World Championship level.

    Also, Tam Nsaliwa seems to have taken on a mythical ability amongst some V's. Having not seen much of him, is he really that incredible?
    Well about Brian Trottier, he had gained US citizenship through his wife. Furthermore the Canada cup was an NHL event with really no rules besides citizenship. I am sure the IIHF would not allow it.

    Evgeni Nabokov was an interesting case, he had played for Kazhakstan however at a time when he had no choice but to do so. I am not sure about the sports situation of hockey in former soviet republics but I know he was forced to play for them. He spent 4-5 years trying to get the IIHF to change his eligibility

    Anyway Tam Nsaliwa would just be a good backup or somoene who could start, hes good but not great depth purposes.

  8. #8

    Default

    actually brian trottier is native ,his status card was all he needed to switch sides.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    North York
    Posts
    6,292
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Ian Kennett

    Would Canada be still in the hunt or comfortably through to the Hex if these three players had suited up for the current WCQ? How about Nsaliwa added to the mix? What would our starting lineup have looked like?

    If you think that we would be coasting, comparatively speaking, then the CSA must immediately begin aggressively asking FIFA to changes its rules about citizens of one country playing for another based upon the nationality of their mother or father as was the case with Hargraeves and Fernandes. The CSA must demand that only players who are born in a country, or have legally and legitimately acquired citizenship in another country completely independently of their ancestry, may play for a national team. In addition, we obviously need to do much, much more (and there have been all kinds of suggestions posted on this board) to provide players such as JDG2 a reason to play for Canada as their first choice. It is an expensive thing in terms of lost talent for lesser soccer nations. Even the USA is losing very good players as can be seen with Rossi and, very likely, Subotic.

    If you feel that the inclusion of these players would make little difference to our present WCQ chances, then clearly, Canada is NOT producing players who ever possess truly World class talent, with a rare few exceptions over a long period of time. In this case, we are really and truly lost until such time as the provinces act in the interests of indiviual players, provide for improved and mandatory coaching certification, and make it as part of every provincial vision that getting to the World Cup is THE number one national priority for soccer in this country. Until such time, ???

    Like most, if not all of you, I am gutted by the poor showing, again, of the MNT during WCQ. In fact, if any tangible, legislated, positive changes do not happen immediately to improve the situation, my 23 years of being a Canada supporter will soon end - it is literally too stressful to hope and dream for a losing program (my sincere apologies to the players who give it their all time and again!).

    So, my question to you, aside from those posed above, is this. What MUST the CSA do to finally make things better, and how does a guy like me become involved in the process? After all, it is one thing for me to chirp, but quite another to actually DO something since the arrogant, ignorant, foolish, and weak CSA directors do not listen to mere words or common sense.

    Cheers!
    In order of importance. My Opinion on the three players who chose not represnt Canada that you mentioned:

    1) **********. YES he would have helped a great deal. Has lived up to Voyageur hype and exceeded it. He has big game experience. Was arguably ( along with Beckham) England's best player at the last WC. A regular starter on two of the biggest clubs in the world and has won two CL titles. Has loads champions league experience and is in his prime. And is still has a few years to go before he is past his prime. There is evidence of his quality: from unbiased third party sources, his pro career progression and his transfers market value. You don't need to ask if he is any good.

    2) Jon Deguzman. Maybe, Maybe not. As it stands, based on where is playing, he would have been in the starting 11 for DM. But its still unknown whether he will live up to the Voyageur hype and, if the quality he brings would have made a huge difference. Given his age and experience its unknown if he would have even made a difference. There is some evidence from media and unbiased third party sources of potential and of interest from really big clubs from a few snippets that get seen here. But in the bigger picture he is not as well known of a commodity and I can think of many detailed reports ( through searches for the better youths players at the world level ) that I have looked at who don't even mention his name or barely mention his name. There might even be other concacaf players of his age that have made more headlines in Europe such as Gio Dos Santos, J Altidore and Micheal Bradley. Jono was on the Dutch Olympic team, an impressive achievement, but if he was the kind of talent some have made him out to be, you would think that he would have, at least, garnered a spot on the bench, for the team that went to the Euros or even the recent Dutch WCQ squad. I think that if he turns out to be as good as his bro, it would still be an impressive achievement.

    3) Fernandes. NO evidence that he would have helped. A perfect example of making a mountain out of a molehill and of " oooo'ing ahh'ing" over the collectors card profile but not ever asking the most important question: IS HE ANY GOOD?. There is no evidence from what is known about his career so far that he is any better than what we have. He is known in system by the coaches and he was assessed by the coaches. Cant say he wasn't given a chance. What coach doesn't want good players on his team?


  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ubiquity
    Posts
    6,543

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Free kick

    quote:Originally posted by Ian Kennett

    Would Canada be still in the hunt or comfortably through to the Hex if these three players had suited up for the current WCQ? How about Nsaliwa added to the mix? What would our starting lineup have looked like?

    If you think that we would be coasting, comparatively speaking, then the CSA must immediately begin aggressively asking FIFA to changes its rules about citizens of one country playing for another based upon the nationality of their mother or father as was the case with Hargraeves and Fernandes. The CSA must demand that only players who are born in a country, or have legally and legitimately acquired citizenship in another country completely independently of their ancestry, may play for a national team. In addition, we obviously need to do much, much more (and there have been all kinds of suggestions posted on this board) to provide players such as JDG2 a reason to play for Canada as their first choice. It is an expensive thing in terms of lost talent for lesser soccer nations. Even the USA is losing very good players as can be seen with Rossi and, very likely, Subotic.

    If you feel that the inclusion of these players would make little difference to our present WCQ chances, then clearly, Canada is NOT producing players who ever possess truly World class talent, with a rare few exceptions over a long period of time. In this case, we are really and truly lost until such time as the provinces act in the interests of indiviual players, provide for improved and mandatory coaching certification, and make it as part of every provincial vision that getting to the World Cup is THE number one national priority for soccer in this country. Until such time, ???

    Like most, if not all of you, I am gutted by the poor showing, again, of the MNT during WCQ. In fact, if any tangible, legislated, positive changes do not happen immediately to improve the situation, my 23 years of being a Canada supporter will soon end - it is literally too stressful to hope and dream for a losing program (my sincere apologies to the players who give it their all time and again!).

    So, my question to you, aside from those posed above, is this. What MUST the CSA do to finally make things better, and how does a guy like me become involved in the process? After all, it is one thing for me to chirp, but quite another to actually DO something since the arrogant, ignorant, foolish, and weak CSA directors do not listen to mere words or common sense.

    Cheers!
    In order of importance. The three players who chose not represnt Canada that you mentioned:

    1) Hargreave. YES he would have helped a great deal. Has lived up to Voyageur hype and exceeded it. He has big game experience. Was arguably ( along with Beckham) England's best player at the last WC. A regaulr starter on two of the biggest clubs in the world. Has loads champions league experience and is in his prime. And is still has a few years to go before he is past his prime. There is evidence of his quality: from third party sources and career progression and transfers market. You dont need to ask if he is any good.

    2) Deguzman. Maybe, Maybe not. As it stands, based on where is palying, he would have been in the starting 11 for DM. But its still unknown whether he will live up to the Voyageur hype and, if the quality he brings would have made a huge difference. Given his age and expereince its unknown if he would have even made a difference. There is some evidence from media and unbiased third party sources of potential and of interest from really big clubs from a few snippets that get seen here. But in the biggers picture he is not as well known of a commodity and I can think of many detailed reports ( through searches for the better youths players at the world level ) that I have looked at who dont even mention his name or barely mention his name. He was on the dutch olympic team and that impressive as an achievement but if he was the kind of talent some have made it out to be, you would think taht he would have, at least, garnered a spot on the bench, for the team that went to the Euros. I think that if he turns out to be as good as his bro, it would still be an impressive achievement.

    3) Fernandes. NO evidence that he would have helped. A perfect example of making a mountain out of a molehill and of " oohing ahhing" over the playing card profile but not ever asking the most important question: IS HE ANY GOOD?. There is no evidence from what is known about his career so far that he is any better than what we have. He is known in system by the coaches and he was assessed by the coaches. cant say he wasn't given a chance. What coach doesn't want good players on his team?
    I can't agree with your analysis.

    Every single one of them would have helped, and would be helping right now. Their role would not be definitive, because a definitive role would be a killer striker, an experienced creative mid and a strong fast and experienced central defender. These are our defects. As is we would have gotten: a similar player to Julian de G in **********, a workhorse with passing quality but no goal scorer and only an average passer: an inexperienced creative mid who may still be too young to make an impact, but could have given us a bit of bite and flash from the middle; and a more reliable keeper, Bundesliga quality, physically stronger than what we have and perhaps more of a leader on the field (two average MLS keepers, one getting on in years, and a Champions League quality keeper who has not played more than a year straight as a starter in the last 5.)

    So the difference with these three would have been slight, probably not enough to beat Mexico there but maybe enough to have held on vs. Honduras or saved that stinker Jamaica scored on us. But there is no way of knowing all this, maybe Dale would have screwed up their talents as well and they would have looked way worse than they do in their respective clubs. If you don't play the talent right, if you don't even know how to get the most of what you have (has Dale even watched any of our European players live? All he'd need is a 10 day to 2 week trip to the Isles, Germany, Denmark and Spain to get an idea).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •