Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Why not this line-up against Cuba??

  1. #1

    Default Why not this line-up against Cuba??

    Hi,

    -Carlo and Hume (or even Xausa) up front.
    -Paul in the midfield.
    -Nick on the bench.
    -Kevin on defense.
    -Fenwick or his protégé, Hastings, on the bench.

    Tell me this team couldn't have done better against Cuba. Please, explain how.

    Time for Holger to go.

    Paul
    Today is the tomorrow that you worried about yesterday - Edith Bunker

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
    Posts
    1,386

    Default

    Maybe you should apply for the job Paddy, since you're a better tactician than Holger and all...

    Mimglow, Ottawa
    _________________________
    You are the witness of change
    And to counteract
    We gotta take the power back
    Rage Against The Machine

  3. #3

    Default

    Hi,

    Thanks for your opinion. You have really cleared up this matter for me.

    Paul

  4. #4

    Default

    Hi,

    Thanks for your opinion. You have really cleared up this matter for me.

    Paul

  5. #5

    Default

    Hi,

    Thanks for your opinion. You have really cleared up this matter for me.

    Paul

  6. #6
    Lord Lab Rat Cheeta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    6,172
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Well, I must have blinders on.

    I'm the only one in Canadian Soccerdom who though Paul F. had a hell of a pair of games. (Midfield on both goals! JDV a bit at fault on both goals! That 2nd goal, ug and double ug.)

    My coachs as a wee cub are to blame of course. With better coaching, oh yeah, and talent, I'd have been out there playing monday instead of working in a machine shop.

    Still can't believe we lost monday. Simply can't believe McKenna didn't score but I'll agree on the starting lineup not being selected as the best.

    Yes, Diesel in an attacking mid. role supporting 2 strikers. Make that field nice and wide. Hume to start okay, but Big Kev stays up front (How? How? How could he not?!!)

    Nick's not even on the bench. Off to the salon and then back to the left coast. Thanks. See, yah.

    Nash was spent. If he dosen't bring his best passing to the match he dosen't bring anything. And besides, on saturday it was Nash, Hastings and Nick who're stumbling around on that left side all stupid. Hard to keep that going. Nash out Atiba in. Never hurts to have those long shanks ranging all over the middle third dose it?

    MC2 and Hastings still start simply because who else can you put out there?

    "Minority of one"

  7. #7
    Lord Lab Rat Cheeta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    6,172
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Well, I must have blinders on.

    I'm the only one in Canadian Soccerdom who though Paul F. had a hell of a pair of games. (Midfield on both goals! JDV a bit at fault on both goals! That 2nd goal, ug and double ug.)

    My coachs as a wee cub are to blame of course. With better coaching, oh yeah, and talent, I'd have been out there playing monday instead of working in a machine shop.

    Still can't believe we lost monday. Simply can't believe McKenna didn't score but I'll agree on the starting lineup not being selected as the best.

    Yes, Diesel in an attacking mid. role supporting 2 strikers. Make that field nice and wide. Hume to start okay, but Big Kev stays up front (How? How? How could he not?!!)

    Nick's not even on the bench. Off to the salon and then back to the left coast. Thanks. See, yah.

    Nash was spent. If he dosen't bring his best passing to the match he dosen't bring anything. And besides, on saturday it was Nash, Hastings and Nick who're stumbling around on that left side all stupid. Hard to keep that going. Nash out Atiba in. Never hurts to have those long shanks ranging all over the middle third dose it?

    MC2 and Hastings still start simply because who else can you put out there?

    "Minority of one"

  8. #8

    Default

    Hi,

    Kevin on the back line because the "inert duo" just can't cut it. Kev is a good defender. I am not saying we should have played for the tie, but it was all we needed. Hume would have run his ass off up front. I just can’t fathom why Nick was on with fresh legs on the bench.

    Lets hope we field a decent team against Finland.

    Paul

  9. #9

    Default

    Hi,

    Kevin on the back line because the "inert duo" just can't cut it. Kev is a good defender. I am not saying we should have played for the tie, but it was all we needed. Hume would have run his ass off up front. I just can’t fathom why Nick was on with fresh legs on the bench.

    Lets hope we field a decent team against Finland.

    Paul

  10. #10
    Lord Lab Rat Cheeta's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    6,172
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Still willing to have another look at Pizzolitto. Can't say that I expect Holger well ever start the man but if Nevio is game enough to follow our Red Minnows around the globe he might get his chance yet.

    Hume wasn't too sharp on the chances he had. Held that one ball way, way too long and made quite a hash of that ball that was delivered to him in the left penalty all free and alone but yeah, he'd have spred those Cubans out a little had he started and he's certainly got a head for the game. He's going to be something if he continues developing.

    "Minority of one"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •